me share some questions, flies buzz my head.
Is it fair justice? Are you standing on your feet a just world upside down?
The Zapatista Iraq, which gave the Zapatazos against Bush, was sentenced to three years in prison. Do not you deserve, rather, a medal?
Who is the terrorist? Does the shoe or shoe? Not guilty of terrorism, the serial killer that lie invented the Iraq war, killed a mob and legalized torture and ordered to apply?
guilty Are the people of Atenco, Mexico, or the Mapuche Indians of Chile, or the Kekchi of Guatemala, or Brazil's landless peasants, accused all of terrorism to defend their right
to earth? If the land is sacred, although the law does not say, are not sacred, too, who defend?
According to the magazine Foreign Policy, Somalia is the most dangerous of all. But who are the pirates? Will starving that assault ships or Wall Street speculators, who have spent years
storming the world and are now getting multi-million dollar rewards for their labors?
Why Why the world rewards those who pillage?
why justice is blind in one eye? Wal Mart, the most powerful company of all, bans trade unions. McDonald's, too. Why do these companies violate with impunity offender, the law
internationally? Is it because in the world of work is worth our time unless the garbage is worth much less the rights of workers?
Who are the righteous and the unrighteous who? If international justice really exists, why have not judged the powerful? Prisoners are not the authors of the most ferocious butchers. Is it because it is they who hold the keys of prisons?
Is it fair justice? Are you standing on your feet a just world upside down?
The Zapatista Iraq, which gave the Zapatazos against Bush, was sentenced to three years in prison. Do not you deserve, rather, a medal?
Who is the terrorist? Does the shoe or shoe? Not guilty of terrorism, the serial killer that lie invented the Iraq war, killed a mob and legalized torture and ordered to apply?
guilty Are the people of Atenco, Mexico, or the Mapuche Indians of Chile, or the Kekchi of Guatemala, or Brazil's landless peasants, accused all of terrorism to defend their right
to earth? If the land is sacred, although the law does not say, are not sacred, too, who defend?
According to the magazine Foreign Policy, Somalia is the most dangerous of all. But who are the pirates? Will starving that assault ships or Wall Street speculators, who have spent years
storming the world and are now getting multi-million dollar rewards for their labors?
Why Why the world rewards those who pillage?
why justice is blind in one eye? Wal Mart, the most powerful company of all, bans trade unions. McDonald's, too. Why do these companies violate with impunity offender, the law
internationally? Is it because in the world of work is worth our time unless the garbage is worth much less the rights of workers?
Who are the righteous and the unrighteous who? If international justice really exists, why have not judged the powerful? Prisoners are not the authors of the most ferocious butchers. Is it because it is they who hold the keys of prisons?
To continue reading click to read more
Why are untouchable the five powers that have the right veto in the UN? Is that right has divine origin? Velan for peace "that make the business of war? Is it fair that world peace is in charge of the five major powers who are
producing weapons? Without underestimating the drug, is not this also a case of "organized crime"?
But do not demand punishment against the masters of the world, cries of those who demand everywhere, the penalty death. Of course. The cries cry out against the murderers who use knives, not against
using missiles.
And you wonder: since these vigilantes are so mad desire to kill Why not demand the death penalty against social injustice? Is it just a world that minutes allocated three million dollars in military spending, while fifteen die every minute
children from starvation or curable disease? Against whom is armed, to the teeth, the so-called international community? Against poverty or
against the poor?
fervent Why capital punishment does not require the death penalty against the values \u200b\u200bof the consumer society, which daily threaten public safety? Or do not invite crime
the bombing stunning advertising to millions and millions of unemployed or poorly paid, repeating them day and night to be is to have, own a car, have branded shoes, take, take, and
who has not, not is?
Why not implant the death penalty against death? The world is organized in the service of death. Or does not make death
military industry, which consumes most of our resources and much of our energy? The masters of the world only condemn
violence when exercised by others. And this monopoly of violence results in an inexplicable to the aliens, and unbearable for the land that we are still against any
evidence survival: humans are the only animals specialized in mutual extermination, and have developed a technology that is annihilating destruction, by the way, the planet
and all its inhabitants.
This technology feeds on fear. It is fear which manufactures enemies to justify police and military waste. And in train to implement the death penalty, what if we condemn to death to fear? Would not it be healthy to end this frightening universal dictatorship
professional? The sowers of panic we are doomed to loneliness, we prohibit solidarity: every man for himself, each aplastaos
others, the neighbor is always a danger that lurks, eye, very careful, he will steal, it will rape you, this stroller a bomb hidden Muslim and whether she looks at you, that innocent-looking neighbor, is sure to spread you swine.
In the world upside down, afraid even the most basic acts of justice and common sense. When President Evo Morales started the re-founding of Bolivia, for this country's indigenous majority leave
be ashamed to look in the mirror, caused panic. This challenge was disastrous from the point of view of traditional racist order, claiming to be the only possible order: Evo was brought chaos and violence, and because of her national unity would burst, broken into pieces. And when Ecuador's President Correa announced that he refused to pay legitimate debts, the news caused terror in the financial world and Ecuador was threatened with dire punishment, being given such a bad example. If the military dictatorships
and thieving politicians have always been pampered by international banks, have we not already accustomed to accept as inevitable destiny of the people who pay the club hits and greed
loot it?
But will they have been divorced forever common sense and justice?
Is not born to walk together, very closely, common sense and justice?
Is not common sense and justice, that slogan of feminists who say that if we, the males get pregnant, abortion would be free? Why not legalize the right
abortion? Is it because then no longer the privilege of women who can afford it and doctors who can collect it?
The same applies to another scandalous case denial of justice and common sense: why not legalize drugs? Is not as
abortion, a public health issue? And the country that contains drug, what is moral authority to condemn those who supply
your claim? Why the mainstream media, as enshrined in the war against the scourge of drugs, never say
comes from Afghanistan almost all the heroin consumed in the world? Who's in charge in Afghanistan? Is not that a country militarily occupied by the country that is attributed messianic mission to save us all?
Why not legalize drugs is a good time? Could it be because they provide the best pretext for military invasions, as well as providing the most handsome profits to the big banks at night working as laundries?
Now the world is sad because they are sold fewer cars. One consequence of the global crisis is the decline of the thriving automotive industry. If we had any other sense, and
little something of the sense of justice should not we celebrate this good news? Or is the decline in cars is not good news, from the point of view of nature, which is a
slightly less poisonous, and pedestrians, who will die a little less?
According to Lewis Carroll, the Queen said to Alice how justice works in wonderland:
"There you are," said the Queen. Is locked up in prison serving his sentence, but the trial did not begin until next Wednesday. And of course, crime will be committed at the end.
In El Salvador, Archbishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero found that justice, as the snake only bites the barefoot. He died with bullets, they complain that in his country were born barefoot in advance convicted for the crime of birth.
The result of the recent elections in El Salvador, is not somehow a homage? A tribute to Archbishop Romero and the thousands who like He died fighting for a fair justice in the kingdom
of injustice?
Sometimes the wrong end of history stories, but her history does not end. When you say goodbye, say goodbye.
Galeano, Eduardo. Sorry for the inconvenience. Page 12.
Why are untouchable the five powers that have the right veto in the UN? Is that right has divine origin? Velan for peace "that make the business of war? Is it fair that world peace is in charge of the five major powers who are
producing weapons? Without underestimating the drug, is not this also a case of "organized crime"?
But do not demand punishment against the masters of the world, cries of those who demand everywhere, the penalty death. Of course. The cries cry out against the murderers who use knives, not against
using missiles.
And you wonder: since these vigilantes are so mad desire to kill Why not demand the death penalty against social injustice? Is it just a world that minutes allocated three million dollars in military spending, while fifteen die every minute
children from starvation or curable disease? Against whom is armed, to the teeth, the so-called international community? Against poverty or
against the poor?
fervent Why capital punishment does not require the death penalty against the values \u200b\u200bof the consumer society, which daily threaten public safety? Or do not invite crime
the bombing stunning advertising to millions and millions of unemployed or poorly paid, repeating them day and night to be is to have, own a car, have branded shoes, take, take, and
who has not, not is?
Why not implant the death penalty against death? The world is organized in the service of death. Or does not make death
military industry, which consumes most of our resources and much of our energy? The masters of the world only condemn
violence when exercised by others. And this monopoly of violence results in an inexplicable to the aliens, and unbearable for the land that we are still against any
evidence survival: humans are the only animals specialized in mutual extermination, and have developed a technology that is annihilating destruction, by the way, the planet
and all its inhabitants.
This technology feeds on fear. It is fear which manufactures enemies to justify police and military waste. And in train to implement the death penalty, what if we condemn to death to fear? Would not it be healthy to end this frightening universal dictatorship
professional? The sowers of panic we are doomed to loneliness, we prohibit solidarity: every man for himself, each aplastaos
others, the neighbor is always a danger that lurks, eye, very careful, he will steal, it will rape you, this stroller a bomb hidden Muslim and whether she looks at you, that innocent-looking neighbor, is sure to spread you swine.
In the world upside down, afraid even the most basic acts of justice and common sense. When President Evo Morales started the re-founding of Bolivia, for this country's indigenous majority leave
be ashamed to look in the mirror, caused panic. This challenge was disastrous from the point of view of traditional racist order, claiming to be the only possible order: Evo was brought chaos and violence, and because of her national unity would burst, broken into pieces. And when Ecuador's President Correa announced that he refused to pay legitimate debts, the news caused terror in the financial world and Ecuador was threatened with dire punishment, being given such a bad example. If the military dictatorships
and thieving politicians have always been pampered by international banks, have we not already accustomed to accept as inevitable destiny of the people who pay the club hits and greed
loot it?
But will they have been divorced forever common sense and justice?
Is not born to walk together, very closely, common sense and justice?
Is not common sense and justice, that slogan of feminists who say that if we, the males get pregnant, abortion would be free? Why not legalize the right
abortion? Is it because then no longer the privilege of women who can afford it and doctors who can collect it?
The same applies to another scandalous case denial of justice and common sense: why not legalize drugs? Is not as
abortion, a public health issue? And the country that contains drug, what is moral authority to condemn those who supply
your claim? Why the mainstream media, as enshrined in the war against the scourge of drugs, never say
comes from Afghanistan almost all the heroin consumed in the world? Who's in charge in Afghanistan? Is not that a country militarily occupied by the country that is attributed messianic mission to save us all?
Why not legalize drugs is a good time? Could it be because they provide the best pretext for military invasions, as well as providing the most handsome profits to the big banks at night working as laundries?
Now the world is sad because they are sold fewer cars. One consequence of the global crisis is the decline of the thriving automotive industry. If we had any other sense, and
little something of the sense of justice should not we celebrate this good news? Or is the decline in cars is not good news, from the point of view of nature, which is a
slightly less poisonous, and pedestrians, who will die a little less?
According to Lewis Carroll, the Queen said to Alice how justice works in wonderland:
"There you are," said the Queen. Is locked up in prison serving his sentence, but the trial did not begin until next Wednesday. And of course, crime will be committed at the end.
In El Salvador, Archbishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero found that justice, as the snake only bites the barefoot. He died with bullets, they complain that in his country were born barefoot in advance convicted for the crime of birth.
The result of the recent elections in El Salvador, is not somehow a homage? A tribute to Archbishop Romero and the thousands who like He died fighting for a fair justice in the kingdom
of injustice?
Sometimes the wrong end of history stories, but her history does not end. When you say goodbye, say goodbye.
Galeano, Eduardo. Sorry for the inconvenience. Page 12.
From: http://mentelibreypensante.blogspot.com/
0 comments:
Post a Comment